What is the term for an argument in which a speaker uses a premise to imply the truth of the
Why is it important to start with general sources?
Why do affirmatives not read definitions of the terms of the resolution?
What are the major requirements or issues an affirmative team must include in a constructive speech?
What is intrinsicness in academic debate?
What is rational argument?
What is the strategy of refutation?
See more
About this website
What is the definition of a significant harm in the stock issues model of policy argument?
What is the definition of a significant harm in the stock issues model of policy argument? -What is wrong, deficient, or imperfect now that we need a policy change to fix.
Which of the following argument strategies for interpersonal relationships do hollihan and baaske recommend?
Which of the following argument strategies for interpersonal relationships do Hollihan and Baaske recommend? Disagreeing with someone can adversely affect that person's self-esteem.
Which fallacy attacks the person rather than the person's ideas quizlet?
If an individual attacks a person rather than that person's ideas, the individual is committing the ad hominem fallacy.
What according to the authors of your text is the most important benefit of consulting specialized sources of information?
What according to the authors of your text is the "most important benefit" of consulting specialized sources of information? You can discover more than you think you need.
Which of the following fallacies is also referred to as a false dilemma?
A false dilemma, also referred to as false dichotomy, is an informal fallacy based on a premise that erroneously limits what options are available. The source of the fallacy lies not in an invalid form of inference but in a false premise.
Which of the following fallacies is also referred to as a false dilemma quizlet?
False Dilemma - (also known as: false dichotomy*, the either-or fallacy, either-or reasoning, fallacy of false choice, fallacy of false alternatives, black-and-white thinking, the fallacy of exhaustive hypotheses, bifurcation, excluded middle, no middle ground, polarization)
What is an Ad hominem argument quizlet?
Ad hominem. argumentum ad hominem which means "argument addressed to the person" instead of the issue. in other words, a personal attack, attacking the person instead of attacking the issue. examples.
Which of the following is the best definition of proposal logic?
Which of the following is the best definition of proposal logic? Identifying a problem and then coming up with a solution.
Which of the following terms refers to the view that the best test of a truth of an argument is its ability to compete with other ideas?
The view that the best test of a truth of an argument is its ability to compete with other ideas is known as: the marketplace theory of ideas.
Which of the following is easier if an audience is knowledgeable about the subject matter?
If an audience is knowledgeable about the subject matter, it makes it easier for an advocate to: effectively employ jargon.
Comm 311 - Ch. 6 Flashcards | Quizlet
Start studying Comm 311 - Ch. 6. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.
Final Exam Study Guide Flashcards | Quizlet
Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards terms like Which of the following does your textbook recommend as a way to deal with stage fright? a. Acquire speaking experience. b. Turn negative thoughts into positive ones. c. Don't expect perfection. d. all of the above e. a and b only, Which of the following does your textbook recommend as a way to deal with nervousness in your speeches?
WORLD TRAINING INSTITUTE
Chapter 11 Study Questions . 54. According to your textbook, language is important because it a. mirrors reality. * b.
Solved The stories of the birth of the American nation have | Chegg.com
Engineering; Computer Science; Computer Science questions and answers; The stories of the birth of the American nation have little to do with our contemporary view that Americans are freedom-loving individuals.
mycsula176: argumentation midterm
Communication 176: Argumentation Midterm Exam 1.) Argument 2 refers to: A. the type of interactions in which people engage B. the second argument in an extended chain of causal reasoning
What is the term for an argument in which a speaker uses a premise to imply the truth of the
argument in which a speaker uses a premise to imply the truth of the conclusion or asserts that the validity of the conclusion is self-evident; also called circular reasoning. straw man fallacy. Arguments that attempt to disprove an opponent's position by presenting it in an unfair, inaccurate light.
Why is it important to start with general sources?
5 benefits to starting with general sources. 1. broad overview helps to better understand 2. generate a list of headings and synonyms 3. broad understanding of controversy 4. discovery of potential critical responses 5. easier to read and comprehend than more technical writing. interviewing experts.
Why do affirmatives not read definitions of the terms of the resolution?
This is the case because: The definition of terms is embodied in operation of the affirmative plan. An affirmative team whose plan is attacked can choose to present a second or counterplan instead. falsw.
What are the major requirements or issues an affirmative team must include in a constructive speech?
The major requirements or issues an affirmative team must include in a constructive speech. comparative advantage case. Advocates present their policy proposal and then compare the status quo (what exist now) to what would exist after the introduction of alternative policy measures. goals case.
What is intrinsicness in academic debate?
intrinsicness. An argument in academic debate that the value object possesses inherent qualities there are causally related to the value judgment.
What is rational argument?
rational arguments. 1. grounds used as the basis or premise to develop a claim 2. the reasoning that justifies the inferential leap from the grounds to claim 3. the claim itself; which is the conclusion drawn from the grounds and the reasoning. argumentative research.
What is the strategy of refutation?
The strategy of refutation in which the advocate argues that the arguments of another do not take into consideration the complete picture; the process in which an argument is rebutted by a demonstration that the outcome of accepting that argument is not desirable. refutation by additional consideration types.
What is the term for an argument in which a speaker uses a premise to imply the truth of the
argument in which a speaker uses a premise to imply the truth of the conclusion or asserts that the validity of the conclusion is self-evident; also called circular reasoning. straw man fallacy. Arguments that attempt to disprove an opponent's position by presenting it in an unfair, inaccurate light.
Why is it important to start with general sources?
5 benefits to starting with general sources. 1. broad overview helps to better understand 2. generate a list of headings and synonyms 3. broad understanding of controversy 4. discovery of potential critical responses 5. easier to read and comprehend than more technical writing. interviewing experts.
Why do affirmatives not read definitions of the terms of the resolution?
This is the case because: The definition of terms is embodied in operation of the affirmative plan. An affirmative team whose plan is attacked can choose to present a second or counterplan instead. falsw.
What are the major requirements or issues an affirmative team must include in a constructive speech?
The major requirements or issues an affirmative team must include in a constructive speech. comparative advantage case. Advocates present their policy proposal and then compare the status quo (what exist now) to what would exist after the introduction of alternative policy measures. goals case.
What is intrinsicness in academic debate?
intrinsicness. An argument in academic debate that the value object possesses inherent qualities there are causally related to the value judgment.
What is rational argument?
rational arguments. 1. grounds used as the basis or premise to develop a claim 2. the reasoning that justifies the inferential leap from the grounds to claim 3. the claim itself; which is the conclusion drawn from the grounds and the reasoning. argumentative research.
What is the strategy of refutation?
The strategy of refutation in which the advocate argues that the arguments of another do not take into consideration the complete picture; the process in which an argument is rebutted by a demonstration that the outcome of accepting that argument is not desirable. refutation by additional consideration types.